This essay first appeared in the CHED Newsletter - Fall 1996

On-Line Student Interaction for Learning Physical Chemistry.
by
George Long [1], Reed Howald [2], Carol Ann Miderski [3], and Theresa Julia Zielinski [4]

During the Fall of 1995 students from three geographically separated chemistry departments participated in an on-line learning experience in physical chemistry. There were three reasons for this two week experiment. First, the segment would serve as a short test, i.e. a trial run, of the operating procedures for a longer full semester course entitled "Environmental and Industrial Chemistry" planned for the Spring 1996 semester. Second, there was a need to assess student response to this use of technology in teaching a chemistry topic before running the spring course. Third, the Web site manager, George Long, needed to test the structure and operation of the site prior to the start of the spring course.

Participants

The three departments involved in the experiment were located at Niagara University (6 students), Indiana University of Pennsylvania (9 students) and Catawba College (5 students). The listserv manager for this on-line experiment was Don Rosenthal of Clarkson University.

Implementation

Students and faculty subscribed to the OLCC-STU listserv for the course; faculty also subscribed to the OLCC-FAC listserv. The OLCC-STU list was reserved for students and the author of the paper that the students were studying; other faculty monitored student progress but did not post messages to the student list. Participating and observing faculty were anxious to avoid having the discussion dominated by course instructors and consequently students intimidated by the voices of their instructors

Scientific Content / Using a Case Study

A short paper that described the estimation of flame temperatures provided the scientific content for this experiment in on-line learning in physical chemistry. This paper, a case study, was posted on the IUP chemistry department WWW page. Case studies are widely used in business, medicine, industry and engineering to provide `real world' scenarios in which an array of content is embedded. Case studies have also been shown to be very effective for helping students make connections in content and integrating content in to their knowledge base for long term retention. The method relies on the active learning strategies that are the focus of much of today's curriculum reform efforts.




Figure 1. CTOT is the total heat capacity for the number of moles of carbon dioxide and water produced when one mole of propane is burned as a fuel. The heat capacity function in this curve is the cubic polynomial form found in some texts. What's wrong with this graph? Would your students be able to figure it out without you telling them?


Student Access

Students used their local WWW browser to obtain copies of the paper at the start of the mini- session/conference. They then proceeded to develop their expertise in the topic through interaction with each other in their own classes and with peers from the other participating campuses through a mail exploder, i.e. the listserv at Clarkson University. The faculty involved in this project hoped to recreate a CHEMCONF like experience for the students.




Figure 2. This is the curve that results when the alternative polynomial form found in Lewis and Randall is used for heat capacity as a function of temperature. What's wrong with this graph? Would your students be able to figure it out without you telling them? Would they be able to describe the mathematical function for the higher temperature part of the graph without you telling them?


Where is the `Flame' Case Study?

The flame case study paper used in the student mini-conference can be found at two Web sites. The original paper and all accompanying documents are located at http://www.py.iup.edu/college/chemistry/chem-course/trialrun.html. A copy of the paper with corrections added along with other some associated files can be found at http://www.niagara.edu/~tjz under Case Studies. Interested readers are encouraged to check out these Web sites to access the original case and the accompanying files. The file containing the diary of the on-line discussions is especially interesting.




Figure 3. The thermodynamic cycle for the determination of the adiabatic flame temperature of a fuel. Can students with independence and confidence explain each line in the cycle?


Some Outcomes

Overall the project was well received by the small set of faculty and students involved. Some important conclusions were drawn from this trial run. First, faculty involved in the process had very different expectations of what should be accomplished. These different expectations, as well as different teaching styles and course organization made bringing even this small group together a bit of a challenge. It was important to designate one individual to be the expert for a topic and the guide for the student interactions on the listserv. The expert in this case, TJZ, preferred a style in which the students would work among themselves to learn and resolve any problems in the case study, i.e. operate in a discovery/cooperative learning mode.




Figure 4. Given that students were able to go from Figure 1 to Figure 3 would they then be able to develop strategies to evaluate T2 using this integral without you telling them?


How did we do?

One difficulty encountered was the ease or lack of ease with which students could access the WWW and computer stations for using e-mail. Students had different levels of expertise in the use of e-mail and some were not used to and did not respond well to the use of it as a learning device. It was also apparent that the three different instructors fostered participation in the project to different degrees. The class at IUP was the most involved in the project and entered the highest number of postings. They also completed the project with a very high degree of excellence. The IUP students prepared excellent reports and Mathcad documents. Some of these can be found at the IUP web site. It should be noted that for the IUP students participation in this project counted as 10% of their final grade for the course; this was a significant incentive. The NU students participated to a lesser degree. They and their instructor were content to use the mini-conference to study the problem posed in the case and to understand the process in the solution. Comprehension was assessed as part of their normal exam hour exam schedule; exam success on this topic was directly correlated with the degree of participation in the on-line process. Closure for the NU students was adequate but not as well developed as that achieved by the IUP students. The students at Catawba College met serious network and computer access difficulties and their participation diminished as a consequence.

More Assessment

Student response to the on-line learning experience indicates that overall it was a moderate success. This is understandable in terms of network difficulties and student lack of experience in dealing with alternative learning environments. Nevertheless, this outcome is a concern for teachers of young scientists. Our students need to use the Internet and WWW to accelerate their own learning and enhance their access to cutting edge information in any field of future study. A summary of all the assessment comments of the students is located at URL: http://www.niagara.edu/~tjz/dflame/asmnt.htm . Those interested in models of intellectual development will see in the assessment summary examples of various levels of development, i.e. from dualist to relative constructivest levels in the Perry Model.

Significance

This small study may be important in that it provides a good example of using the Internet as a non- traditional instructional tool. With the WWW we can provide students with some of the cutting edge communication and research skills and tools that they will surely need in their careers. We can't let e- mail and Web use be just another after school activity; it will work best when it is an integral part of the of the learning experience. As a result of this study we offer the following suggestions for our colleagues at all levels of the education pipeline. First, provide students with personalized help in starting to use e-mail and the WWW. Next, make time for this in the curriculum by using it in the classroom for original projects and learning experiences that go beyond the delivery of information. Last, integrate the WWW seemlessly into a curriculum and its courses as routine tools for learning. A paper with a more detailed description of this project, its significance, and an analysis of faculty and student assessments is being prepared for publication.

Acknowledgment

TJZ thanks GL for putting the Flame manuscript in html format and getting her started with html. A copy of the Computers in Chemical Education Newsletter article newsletter article that described the on-line experiment can be found at url: http://www.niagara.edu/~tjz/dpapers/flame_news.htm.

[Theresa Julia Zielinski teaches in the Department of Chemistry and Physics, Niagara University, Niagara University NY 14109, tjz@niagara.edu; George Long teaches in the Department of Chemistry, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana PA 15705-1090, GLong@grove.iup.edu; Reed Howald teaches in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, uchrh@earth.oscs.montana.edu; Carol Ann Miderski teaches in the Department of Chemistry, Catawba College, Salisbury NC 28144, CMidersk@catawba.edu.]

[1] George Long Department of Chemistry
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Indiana PA 15705-1090
[2] Reed Howald Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT 59717
[3] Carol Ann Miderski Department of Chemistry
Catawba College
Salisbury NC 28144
[4] Theresa Julia Zielinski Department of Chemistry and Physics
Niagara University
Niagara University NY 14109

Physical Chemistry Education Resource Center
Comments to Theresa Julia Zielinski tzielins@monmouth.edu
All contents copyright (c)1996; All rights reserved
Created: May 1996; Updated: July 23, 1996
URL: http/www.monmouth.edu/~tzielins/dpapers/flm_3nws.htm